“Kill a Cop, Get Death—Kill a Civilian, Get a Paid Vacation”
The Commander and Queef has spoken: anyone who kills a cop should get the death penalty—automatically. Just like red flag gun laws, due process gets tossed aside because, in their minds, authority trumps justice.
The idea that killing a cop deserves harsher punishment than killing anyone else is a joke of the highest order. But of course, how dare anyone defy a costumed agent? “Let the courts decide,” they say. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Let’s break it down. Cops get things wrong all the time. They shoot unarmed civilians, raid the wrong homes, and kill people based on faulty information, yet they almost always walk free under qualified immunity—shielded from the same system that punishes the rest of us.
So let’s ask the real question: Why not apply the same law equally? If killing a cop guarantees an automatic death sentence, why not make it the same for any wrongful killing? At least then, trigger-happy cops might think twice before opening fire over an acorn hitting a car.
The truth is, police are part of a protected class—just like politicians, judges, district attorneys, and the rich. We already live under a multi-tiered justice system that favors power. This only cements it further.
And while we’re at it—does anyone know of a single government-run program that runs at over 90% efficiency? No? Then why are conviction rates in this country so absurdly high? Because the system is built on corruption, not justice.
Which brings us to Trump. The same man who says the system is weaponized against him now wants to hand it more power? He claims the courts are stacked, the judges are biased, and the government is out to get him. So what does he do? Offer them more unchecked authority, hoping they’ll be fair when it’s his turn at the altar of the state.
Can’t have it both ways. Either you believe the government is infallible and always deserves the benefit of the doubt, or you recognize the truth: when someone gets a government job, they don’t magically become better, more just, or more competent. They remain the same person they were before—corrupt if they were corrupt, honest if they were honest.
Of course, it’s easy to take this stance when you’re a billionaire. Trump and his family can afford the best lawyers money can buy. When the system comes for them, they fight back with teams of high-priced attorneys.
But what about everyone else?
The average person doesn’t get justice—they get a public defender (a “government-appointed speed bump”) juggling dozens of cases, rushing through a broken system designed for convictions, not fairness. The government has unlimited resources, prosecutors who play dirty, and judges who rarely rule against the state. If they want you gone, you’re gone.
So before anyone cheers for handing the government more power, ask yourself—how well do you think this will work out for the people who can’t afford to fight back?


